News
live
UPDATED 4 days ago
Trump Sentenced to Unconditional Discharge in New York Case
Comments
Link successfully copied
President-elect Donald Trump appears remotely for a sentencing hearing in front of New York State Judge Juan Merchan with his attorney Todd Blanche (L) at Manhattan Criminal Court on Jan. 10, 2025. (Angela Weiss - Pool/Getty Images)
1/10/2025
Updated: 1/10/2025
Trump Reacts to Unconditional Discharge
Link successfully copied
Jackson Richman
4 days ago
President-elect Trump criticized Judge Juan Merchan’s sentence of an unconditional discharge, which means no penalty but keeps his conviction in his legal record.

“ That result alone proves that, as all Legal Scholars and Experts have said, THERE IS NO CASE, THERE WAS NEVER A CASE, and this whole Scam fully deserves to be DISMISSED,” he posted on Truth Social on Friday.

Trump said he will appeal the conviction.

ADVERTISEMENT
Trump Given an Unconditional Discharge
Link successfully copied
Jackson Richman
4 days ago
Judge Juan Merchan said he’ll give President-elect Trump an unconditional discharge. This means that no penalty is issued other than a conviction being entered on Trump’s legal record.

The sentencing formalizes Trump’s felony conviction.

Trump is expected to appeal the conviction.

ADVERTISEMENT
Judge Merchan Speaks From the Bench
Link successfully copied
Jacob Burg
4 days ago
After President-elect Donald Trump defended his innocence, Judge Juan Merchan began speaking from the bench.

Merchan said a judge must consider a case’s facts and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

“Never before has this court been presented with such a unique and remarkable set of circumstances,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT
Trump Calls Case ‘An Embarrassment’
Link successfully copied
Samantha Flom
4 days ago
President-elect Donald Trump said during his sentencing for the falsification of business records that the case was “an embarrassment” to New York.

“I got indicted over calling a legal expense a legal expense,” Trump told the New York court on Friday.

“I just want to say I think it’s an embarrassment to New York, and New York has a lot of problems, but this is a great embarrassment.”

Trump noted that he did not personally record the hush money payments in his books as that task was performed by his accountants.

He also contended that labeling them as legal expenses was appropriate given that they were reimbursements for a service performed by his attorney.

“I didn’t call them construction, concrete work. I didn’t call them electrical work. I didn’t call them—they called a legal fee, or a legal expense, a legal expense.”

The president-elect added that he felt the case qualified as a weaponization of justice and that he had been treated “very, very unfairly.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Trump Speaks
Link successfully copied
Jacob Burg
4 days ago
After President-elect Donald Trump's lawyer, Todd Blanche, rebutted the prosecution, Trump spoke virtually via Teams.

“This has been a very terrible experience. I think it has been a tremendous setback for New York and the New York court system,” Trump said.

The president-elect called the case a “political witch hunt.”

“It was done to damage my reputation so that I would lose the election, and obviously, that didn’t work,” he added.

Trump suggested that voters witnessed what happened in the courtroom and threw their support behind him because they thought it was a “disgrace.”

“I’m totally innocent. I did nothing wrong,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT
Trump Lawyer Disagrees With Prosecution
Link successfully copied
Jackson Richman
4 days ago
Trump lawyer Todd Blanche, who will be nominated to be the president-elect’s deputy attorney general, contests the prosecution’s remarks regarding the president-elect’s conduct.

“I very, very much disagree with much of what the government just said about this case, about the legitimacy of what happened in this courtroom during this trial, and about President Trump’s conduct fighting this case," he said.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Prosecutors Agree to Unconditional Discharge
Link successfully copied
Jackson Richman
4 days ago
Prosecutors agreed with Judge Juan Merchan, saying he’ll issue an unconditional discharge—resulting in no penalty but leaving a conviction on Trump’s legal record.

This, said Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass, is due to “all the circumstances of this case, its unique posture, and the defendant’s status as president-elect.”
“The verdict in this case was unanimous and decisive, and it must be respected,” he said.

Trump, he said, could have gotten as much as four years behind bars.

ADVERTISEMENT
Trump Appears Virtually for Sentencing
Link successfully copied
Samantha Flom
4 days ago
President-elect Donald Trump will attend his sentencing via a video feed from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, on Friday.

Judge Juan Merchan is expected to sentence Trump to an unconditional discharge, meaning that the president-elect will face no penalties for the 34 felony counts of falsifying business records he was convicted of last May.

Trump maintains his innocence of any wrongdoing in the case. He petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to halt his sentencing, but the high court rejected that request.

ADVERTISEMENT
Trump Vows to Appeal
Link successfully copied
Samantha Flom
4 days ago
President-elect Donald Trump has promised to appeal the case “for the sake and sanctity of the presidency.”

“I will be appealing this case, and am confident that JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Thursday.

“The pathetic, dying remnants of the Witch Hunts against me will not distract us as we unite and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

His pledge followed the U.S. Supreme Court’s denial of his request to stop his sentencing from going forward.

The court reasoned that Trump’s claims of evidentiary violations could be addressed during the ordinary course of appeal. The justices also noted that Trump was slated to receive a no-penalty sentence, so the burden he faced was light.

ADVERTISEMENT
What to Know
Link successfully copied
Samantha Flom
4 days ago
A New York judge will soon sentence President-elect Donald Trump for the crime of falsifying business records.

Here’s what to know about the case:

  • Trump was convicted last May on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal $130,000 in hush money payments his attorney made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

  • Daniels and Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, testified against him in court.

  • Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg prosecuted the case.

  • Judge Juan Merchan is the presiding judge.

  • Trump remains under a gag order that bars him from speaking out about the prosecution team, court staffers, or their family members, including Merchan’s daughter.

  • Merchan has indicated he plans to order an “unconditional discharge,” a no-penalty sentence that ensures Trump will see no jail time.

  • Trump is expected to appear virtually for his sentencing.

  • The president-elect is the first U.S. president to be convicted of a felony.


ADVERTISEMENT

NEW YORK CITY—President-elect Donald Trump is expected to be sentenced on Jan. 10 in his business records case, 10 days before his inauguration.

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has already indicated that he won’t give Trump any prison time or monetary punishment.

In a Jan. 3 order, Merchan said his inclination is not to impose any sentence of incarceration and that given concerns about presidential immunity, “an unconditional discharge appears to be the most viable solution.”

Trump is set to appear virtually rather than in person.

With an unconditional discharge, Merchan isn’t expected to impose any meaningful punishment but rather will likely enter a judgment of conviction and offer a statement condemning Trump’s actions.

(Illustration by The Epoch Times, Getty Images)

(Illustration by The Epoch Times, Getty Images)

“He’s going to take an opportunity to try to give Trump a tongue lashing, to try to make him look bad,” Heritage Foundation Vice President John Malcolm told The Epoch Times. Malcolm, who directs the foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, said Merchan may accuse Trump of disrespecting the rule of law but ultimately not impose any sentence because Trump is about to take office.

The sentencing comes after a nearly two-year legal battle that started with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg indicting Trump in April 2023. More than a year later, in May 2024, a jury found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in relation to alleged payments to adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, also known as Stormy Daniels.

As the case played out, Merchan imposed multiple gag orders on Trump, held him in contempt 10 times, and threatened jail time. Merchan accused Trump on Jan. 3 of having disdain for the judiciary.

Merchan’s comments were made as he rejected the idea that Trump’s character should serve as a basis for throwing out the jury verdict.

“Defendant’s disdain for the Third Branch of government, whether state or federal, in New York or elsewhere, is a matter of public record,” he said. “Indeed, Defendant has gone to great lengths to broadcast on social media and other forums his lack of respect for judges, juries, grand juries, and the justice system as a whole.”

Trump has denied wrongdoing and derided the case as illegitimate.

Just before sentencing, he filed multiple appeals in order to stave off the sentencing date and challenge the legitimacy of the case.

On Jan. 7, a New York appeals court denied Trump’s request to halt sentencing and the next day, the president-elect to ask for the U.S. Supreme Court’s intervention.

He filed his application for a stay to Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who requested a response from Bragg’s office by 10 a.m. on Jan. 9. Later the same day, the court rejected Trump’s request to stop the sentencing.

Trump has asked it to consider whether he is entitled to an automatic stay, as well as whether Merchan’s admission of certain evidence violated the doctrine of presidential immunity. Another question that he proposed was whether presidential immunity extended to presidents-elect, which Merchan had rejected on Jan. 3.

Merchan had also rejected Trump’s arguments that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. United States, which established that presidents enjoy certain levels of immunity from criminal prosecution, undermined Bragg’s case.

Merchan said in a Dec. 16, 2024, opinion that Trump had waited too long to file objections to Bragg’s use of certain evidence, while the evidence that he contested surrounded conduct that was unofficial and therefore unprotected by the doctrine of presidential immunity.

In a post on Truth Social on Dec. 17, 2024, Trump criticized Merchan’s decisions on the presidential immunity arguments. Merchan had “completely disrespected the United States Supreme Court, and its Historic Decision on Immunity,” he said.

The president-elect said the opinion written by Merchan “goes against our Constitution, and, if allowed to stand, would be the end of the Presidency as we know it.”

Regardless of whether he is sentenced, Trump could later seek to overturn the conviction based on presidential immunity or other factors. Trump has told multiple courts that he is entitled to an automatic stay because of the nature of presidential immunity, but Merchan and the New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, disagreed, rejecting his appeals.

The New York state business records case is one of two remaining criminal cases against Trump, as two others, brought by special counsel Jack Smith, have been dismissed. After Trump’s electoral victory in November 2024, Smith filed to dismiss the Washington election interference case and an appeal related to the Florida classified documents case, while citing a long-standing Department of Justice assertion that prosecution of sitting presidents violates the Constitution.

Trump’s other remaining criminal case in Georgia was left on shaky ground last month when an appeals court held that the lead prosecutor, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, should be disqualified. It’s unclear how that case will play out, and legal experts doubt that a state prosecution can continue without violating the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Share This Article:

©2023-2025 California Insider All Rights Reserved. California Insider is a part of Epoch Media Group.